User:George Swan/sandbox/United States Army Field Manual on interrogation

This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.

A user has requested that an administrator delete this page forthwith.

This article is not maintainable in its present form, has not been updated, is incorrect even in out-of-date descriptions. There is no document called "United States Army Field Manual on interrogation". As an expert in the field, I have never seen such a title, past or present. The thrust of this article is about Bush Administration policymakers that referred, incorrectly, to such a manual. There can be articles about interrogation policy, and there can be articles about the actual manuals. For a more detailed and accurate coverage of the subject, see Human-source intelligence. This is an Editor Instruction under CZ:Article Deletion Policy, citing "the article is of such low quality (in terms of inaccuracy, bias, poor writing, or whatever) that it would be more efficient to start over than to try to clean up the current one (this also can be achieved by blanking, if one does in fact wish to start over); "

See also pages that link to this page.

Howard C. Berkowitz 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC), Military Editor

The entire text of this article has been moved by a Constable to the Discussion page, where it may be freely edited and improved by any Citizen. Hayford Peirce 16:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to "improve" an article about something that doesn't exist. Retitle this article and it might be improved. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Military Workgroup Editor

Well, that's exactly what I was going to suggest -- why don't you Move it to the correct place? And then, if you feel like doing so, add perhaps a single sentence to the lede along the lines of, "Although the Bush administration, and many media sources, frequently referred to a "USAFM", such a thing does not, nor did not, ever exist under that particular name. The correct title for this is/was/should be so-and-so." Once this has been done, I will be very happy to delete this incorrectly titled article. Hayford Peirce 19:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)