User:Stephen Ewen: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen |
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<BLOCKQUOTE>habits of thought, reading, writing, and speaking which go beneath surface meaning, first impressions, dominant myths, official pronouncements, traditional cliches, received wisdom, and mere opinions, to understand the deep meaning, root causes, social context, ideology, and personal consequences of any action, event, object, process, organization, experience, text, subject matter, policy, mass media, or discourse.[http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/4/shor.html]</BLOCKQUOTE> | <BLOCKQUOTE>habits of thought, reading, writing, and speaking which go beneath surface meaning, first impressions, dominant myths, official pronouncements, traditional cliches, received wisdom, and mere opinions, to understand the deep meaning, root causes, social context, ideology, and personal consequences of any action, event, object, process, organization, experience, text, subject matter, policy, mass media, or discourse.[http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/4/shor.html]</BLOCKQUOTE> | ||
[[Category:CZ Authors|Ewen, Stephen]] | [[Category:CZ Authors|Ewen, Stephen]] |
Revision as of 20:44, 28 December 2006
About me
I hold the role of Citizendium author and have been here since the earliest days of the project.
Education
- B.A., Liberal Arts & Sciences, Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University
- Additional studies, University of the Nations and United States Department of Agriculture Graduate School
Academic interests
Interdisciplinarity, literatures of discontent, anthropology, politics, philosophy, theology, and education.
Work
I am an instructor of remedial education at a community college. I teach social sciences, literature and reading, writing, and special topics. My pedagogy is that of critical literacy, which Ira Shor defines as
habits of thought, reading, writing, and speaking which go beneath surface meaning, first impressions, dominant myths, official pronouncements, traditional cliches, received wisdom, and mere opinions, to understand the deep meaning, root causes, social context, ideology, and personal consequences of any action, event, object, process, organization, experience, text, subject matter, policy, mass media, or discourse.[1]