User talk:Aleta Curry/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Disambiguation: new section) |
imported>Aleta Curry (→Disambiguation: My guess is one well-constructed cluster would work best.) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
I'd welcome some collaboration in trying to develop an EC guideline here, as well as ideas on the specific topic -- I'm debating whether to create [[Chancellery (disambiguation)]] and if the Nazi disambiguation should move there. Right now, the individual Nazi chancelleries are lemmas, but certainly could become articles of their own. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | I'd welcome some collaboration in trying to develop an EC guideline here, as well as ideas on the specific topic -- I'm debating whether to create [[Chancellery (disambiguation)]] and if the Nazi disambiguation should move there. Right now, the individual Nazi chancelleries are lemmas, but certainly could become articles of their own. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Because we now have a cluster system, I'm conservation in disambiguation. I'd say disambiguation pages are like introductions, properly made when you *have* to, not whenever you could. I would think the Nazi Chancellery would work best as one well-developed cluster, rather than separate articles with a paucity of information on each. You wouldn't, for examples, have separate annotated bibliographies, catalogues and related articles for each, with no overlap, would you? [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 02:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:42, 17 January 2011
Where Aleta lives it is approximately: 22:45
Aleta stops into the forums somewhere between 0630 and 0900, and works on the wiki between about 1200 and 1500, time and weather permitting.
Archive
Hi, Aleta, hope that's what you wanted. --Peter Schmitt 01:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Just so. Thank you! Aleta Curry 01:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
;-)
Hi Aleta and thanks, it's nice to see you too...
Disambiguation
Your points are well taken. I have a challenge myself with what I think is reasonably proper disambiguation, although it may well need to become a cluster -- Nazi Chancellery (disambiguation). There were three Chancellery organizations, plus the Old and New Chancellery Buildings, plus the former Office of the President of the Reich that had a similar function. "Chancellery" in general needs to be disambiguated, in the formal use in international relations: the "Embassy" is where the Ambassador lives, while the "Chancellery" is an office building with diplomatic immunity.
I'd welcome some collaboration in trying to develop an EC guideline here, as well as ideas on the specific topic -- I'm debating whether to create Chancellery (disambiguation) and if the Nazi disambiguation should move there. Right now, the individual Nazi chancelleries are lemmas, but certainly could become articles of their own. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Because we now have a cluster system, I'm conservation in disambiguation. I'd say disambiguation pages are like introductions, properly made when you *have* to, not whenever you could. I would think the Nazi Chancellery would work best as one well-developed cluster, rather than separate articles with a paucity of information on each. You wouldn't, for examples, have separate annotated bibliographies, catalogues and related articles for each, with no overlap, would you? Aleta Curry 02:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)