User talk:Jared Grubb: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
imported>Russell Potter
Line 34: Line 34:
:Many thanks for your note on my Talk page -- delighted you enjoyed the [[John Logie Baird|Baird]] entry.
:Many thanks for your note on my Talk page -- delighted you enjoyed the [[John Logie Baird|Baird]] entry.


:Nominating for Approval doesn't mean that nominator attests to the factuality of every detail in the entry, only that he or she feels the entry is of sufficient scope, quality of writing, etc. and is appropriate for the field.  If you do decide to nominate it, you can ask the the Approvals timer be set for one, two, or more days in the future.  The article then gets announced on our [[CZ:Approval_Announcements]] page, and this will bring the entrty many other people, in the field and outside it, to look it over and (hopefully) catch errors, make improvements, or raise questions about factuality or documentation.
:Nominating for Approval doesn't mean that nominator attests to the factuality of every detail in the entry, only that he or she feels the entry is of sufficient scope, quality of writing, etc. and is appropriate for the field.  If you do decide to nominate it, you can ask the the Approvals timer be set for one, two, or more days in the future.  The article then gets announced on our [[CZ:Approval_Announcements]] page, and this will bring the entry to the attention of many other people, in the field and outside it, to look it over and (hopefully) catch errors, make improvements, or raise questions about factuality or documentation.


:The easiest way make a nomination by leaving a note on the entry's [[Talk:John_Logie_Baird|talk]] page, and also letting one of our constables ([[User_talk:D._Matt_Innis|D. Matt Innis]] or [[User_talk:Stephen_Ewen|Stephen Ewen]]) know about it.  They can then do the tagging or show you how to do it yourself.
:The easiest way make a nomination by leaving a note on the entry's [[Talk:John_Logie_Baird|talk]] page, and also letting one of our constables ([[User_talk:D._Matt_Innis|D. Matt Innis]] or [[User_talk:Stephen_Ewen|Stephen Ewen]]) know about it.  They can then do the tagging or show you how to do it yourself.


:Thanks for considering this entry!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 11:23, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
:Thanks for considering this entry!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 11:23, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:24, 8 July 2007

[User-supplied bio goes in User:Your Name]


Welcome

Citizendium Getting Started
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians  


Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitionsadd metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.

Kind Regards, Robert Tito | Talk 14:50, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Citizendium Editor Policy
The Editor Role | Approval Process | Article Deletion Policy

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}

Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started and our help system for other introductory pages. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. Announcements are also available via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon.

Jared, I approved you as editors in the Engineering Workgroup and the Computers Workgroup. We look forward to your contributions.

--Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 18:09, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

Group Theory Article

What are we going to do with this article? I tend to agree with Greg Martin that it sounds a bit like a collection of facts, lacking narrative structure (no criticism of you or your writing intended!) I've tried suggesting a few ideas, but until my articles Complex number and Prime number were approved yesterday, I've pretty much had my hands full. I had intended to go on and write about some facet of differential geometry (or maybe just a basic article on manifolds), but now I'm beginning to think an article on Lie groups might not be a bad idea. Greg Woodhouse 14:54, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

I agree with his comments. I'll continue this on the talk page. (I wont take it personally!) - Jared Grubb 02:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

John Logie Baird

Hello Jared,

Just a question for you -- I've been at work on the entry on John Logie Baird, which is in the Media workgroup as well as the Engineering Workgroup. Although I'm a Media Workgroup editor, I can't nominate the entry as I have done too much work on it. If you would have a look, and consider whether you feel it's ready to be nomated for Approval, I'd be grateful. Cheers, Russell Potter 19:46, 4 July 2007 (CDT)

Hi again Jared,
Many thanks for your note on my Talk page -- delighted you enjoyed the Baird entry.
Nominating for Approval doesn't mean that nominator attests to the factuality of every detail in the entry, only that he or she feels the entry is of sufficient scope, quality of writing, etc. and is appropriate for the field. If you do decide to nominate it, you can ask the the Approvals timer be set for one, two, or more days in the future. The article then gets announced on our CZ:Approval_Announcements page, and this will bring the entry to the attention of many other people, in the field and outside it, to look it over and (hopefully) catch errors, make improvements, or raise questions about factuality or documentation.
The easiest way make a nomination by leaving a note on the entry's talk page, and also letting one of our constables (D. Matt Innis or Stephen Ewen) know about it. They can then do the tagging or show you how to do it yourself.
Thanks for considering this entry! Russell Potter 11:23, 8 July 2007 (CDT)