Talk:History of the English language: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(change name)
imported>John Stephenson
(changing the name)
Line 23: Line 23:


I suggest we change the name to ''English Language, History'' the goal is to get the major keyword first. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:47, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
I suggest we change the name to ''English Language, History'' the goal is to get the major keyword first. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:47, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
:No problem with that. Objections? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:26, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:26, 24 April 2007


Article Checklist for "History of the English language"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 03:33, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





A Mess

This entry needs considerable work. The material on Proto-English is dubious (though the list of early loanwords should be kept, I think), and it's distracting that the article at first quotes medieval sources on the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, and then tells its readers that this history has been deemed spurious! What's needed early on here is a better genealogy of English, identifying its lineage all the way from the Centum/Satem split on down though the Old Germanic languages.

The later parts of the entry are slightly better, but could use more detail on specific grammatical and phonological changes (where's the Great Vowel Shift?).

I'll be working away with hammer and tongs at this, as time allows.

Russell Potter 09:42, 24 November 2006 (CST)

change name

I suggest we change the name to English Language, History the goal is to get the major keyword first. Richard Jensen 00:47, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

No problem with that. Objections? John Stephenson 03:26, 24 April 2007 (CDT)