User talk:ElectionJune2014/Referenda/1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (a good idea) |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==A fine idea== | ==A fine idea== | ||
Is there still a Chief Constable? Couldn't he/she fulfill a lot of the duties of the O? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | Is there still a Chief Constable? Couldn't he/she fulfill a lot of the duties of the O? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, but the Charter bans constables from making content decisions. Also, they are all Council appointees. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 15:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
::May I take this opportunity to remind people of the unfortunate clash between 36.2 and 39.1.c? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:32, 9 June 2014
"If passed, the new seats shall be filled by special election." This applies only for increase in size, not decrease. Wording should be adjusted. Peter Jackson 09:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- That would be a different referendum, though. In any case, that article is suspended until July. John Stephenson 22:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
A fine idea
Is there still a Chief Constable? Couldn't he/she fulfill a lot of the duties of the O? Russell D. Jones 00:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but the Charter bans constables from making content decisions. Also, they are all Council appointees. John Stephenson 15:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- May I take this opportunity to remind people of the unfortunate clash between 36.2 and 39.1.c? Peter Jackson 16:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)