Archive:Ombudsman Appeals: Difference between revisions
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>John Stephenson (categories) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Ombudsman}} | {{Ombudsman}} | ||
Appeals are governed by the following articles of the Charter. | '''Appeals''' are governed by the following articles of the [[CZ:Charter|Charter]]. | ||
''Article 41'':Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either: | ''Article 41'':Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either: | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==To be clear== | ==To be clear== | ||
Appeals will not be considered merely on the basis that you disagree with a decision, however cogent your arguments and regardless of whether I might agree with you or not. I will not overturn any decision that has been properly made, and is consistent with the Charter, even if I disagree with the decision. | Appeals will not be considered merely on the basis that you disagree with a decision, however cogent your arguments and regardless of whether I might agree with you or not. I will not overturn any decision that has been properly made, and is consistent with the Charter, even if I disagree with the decision. | ||
[[Category:Ombudsman]] | |||
[[Category:Archived Pages]] | |||
Latest revision as of 05:57, 1 July 2014
| Citizendium Ombudsman | ||
|---|---|---|
| Decisions | Referrals | Appeals | Guidelines | Archive |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
Appeals are governed by the following articles of the Charter.
Article 41:Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:
1.New information is available; or
2.A technical error was made during the previous formal procedure.
Article 42 •An Appeals Board shall consist of Citizens who were not previously directly involved, as follows:
1.one member appointed by the Editorial Council,
2.one member appointed by the Management Council, and
3.the Ombudsman or his/her designee.
Article 43 An Appeals Board may render one of three decisions:
it may decide that the disputant does not have new information or that the adjudicating council made no technical error and deny a re-hearing;
it may affirm the adjudicating council's decision, in spite of new information or technical error;
or it may recognize that new information, a technical error, or both has placed the adjudicating council's decision in error and remand the case to the adjudicating council for rehearing.
If the case has been remanded for re-hearing, it is expected that the adjudicating council revise its judgment in light of the appeal.
To be clear
Appeals will not be considered merely on the basis that you disagree with a decision, however cogent your arguments and regardless of whether I might agree with you or not. I will not overturn any decision that has been properly made, and is consistent with the Charter, even if I disagree with the decision.