Social contract: Difference between revisions
imported>Yi Zhe Wu |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Social contract''' is a concept in [[political philosophy]] as a justification for the existence of state, or government, by the consent of the people among themselves and/or with the governing authority, in a collective agreement analogically called "contract". One of the earliest proponent of social contract theory was [[Thomas Hobbes]], who espoused monarchical absolutism. However, the concept was then used by different theorists such as [[John Locke]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] and [[Immanuel Kant]] to arrive to their conclusion supporting different forms of liberal or democratic state. | '''Social contract''' is a concept in [[political philosophy]] as a justification for the existence of state, or government, by the consent of the people among themselves and/or with the governing authority, in a collective agreement analogically called "contract". One of the earliest proponent of social contract theory was [[Thomas Hobbes]], who espoused monarchical absolutism. However, the concept was then used by different theorists such as [[John Locke]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] and [[Immanuel Kant]] to arrive to their conclusion supporting different forms of liberal or democratic state. | ||
In the modern era, social contract was revived again by modern American philosopher | In the modern era, social contract was revived again by modern American philosopher John Rawls. Greatly influenced by the Kantian version of social contract, Rawls rebranded it into his own version and named it "original position" in his ''A Theory of Justice''. | ||
==Hobbes' social contract== | ==Hobbes' social contract== | ||
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), a [[Britain|British]] political philosopher who lived during the [[British Civil War]], propounded his theory concerning political legitimacy of the state in the book ''Leviathan''. To Hobbes, humans are inherently selfish and with unlimited [[greed]], restrained only by the fear of death. If left without a state, [[state of nature]] would ensue, which is " | Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), a [[Britain|British]] political philosopher who lived during the [[British Civil War]], propounded his theory concerning political legitimacy of the state in the book ''Leviathan''. To Hobbes, humans are inherently selfish and with unlimited [[greed]], restrained only by the fear of death. If left without a state, [[state of nature]] would ensue, which is "war of every man against every man", or, in another word, bloody [[chaos]]. To avoid such "war", humans made agreement with each other to conceive an agent, the sovereign, to maintain order and to protect the safety of men. This sovereign himself is not a party of social contract, but only a result of the contract between every man. Therefore, the sovereign is an absolutist [[monarchy|monarch]] with no limitation to his authority. | ||
==Locke's social contract and his natural rights theory== | ==Locke's social contract and his natural rights theory== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Immanuel Kant's social contract within the universal law== | ==Immanuel Kant's social contract within the universal law== | ||
==John Rawls' " | ==John Rawls' "original position"== | ||
==Other theories== | ==Other theories== | ||
==Criticism== | |||
British [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]] philosopher [[John Stuart Mill]] rejected the social contract theory. In the fourth chapter of ''On Liberty'', Mill wrote that "society is not founded on a contract ... no good purpose is answered by inventing a contract in order to deduce social obligations from it".[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:01, 19 October 2024
Social contract is a concept in political philosophy as a justification for the existence of state, or government, by the consent of the people among themselves and/or with the governing authority, in a collective agreement analogically called "contract". One of the earliest proponent of social contract theory was Thomas Hobbes, who espoused monarchical absolutism. However, the concept was then used by different theorists such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant to arrive to their conclusion supporting different forms of liberal or democratic state.
In the modern era, social contract was revived again by modern American philosopher John Rawls. Greatly influenced by the Kantian version of social contract, Rawls rebranded it into his own version and named it "original position" in his A Theory of Justice.
Hobbes' social contract
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), a British political philosopher who lived during the British Civil War, propounded his theory concerning political legitimacy of the state in the book Leviathan. To Hobbes, humans are inherently selfish and with unlimited greed, restrained only by the fear of death. If left without a state, state of nature would ensue, which is "war of every man against every man", or, in another word, bloody chaos. To avoid such "war", humans made agreement with each other to conceive an agent, the sovereign, to maintain order and to protect the safety of men. This sovereign himself is not a party of social contract, but only a result of the contract between every man. Therefore, the sovereign is an absolutist monarch with no limitation to his authority.
Locke's social contract and his natural rights theory
Immanuel Kant's social contract within the universal law
John Rawls' "original position"
Other theories
Criticism
British utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill rejected the social contract theory. In the fourth chapter of On Liberty, Mill wrote that "society is not founded on a contract ... no good purpose is answered by inventing a contract in order to deduce social obligations from it".