Internet censorship: Difference between revisions
imported>Khoa T. Tran |
imported>Khoa T. Tran No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''User report and request for removal:''' This action can be done by anyone who thinks that the content is inappropriate, such as harassment, sexual action, foul language on a website for children. The content will be removed completely if the report is accurate.<br /> | '''User report and request for removal:''' This action can be done by anyone who thinks that the content is inappropriate, such as harassment, sexual action, foul language on a website for children. The content will be removed completely if the report is accurate.<br /> | ||
'''Hosting Company:''' use regulation law or informal request on hosting companies who then must send a deny service signal when user want to go to that specific website. In this case, it depends on the request; the content of the website may still remain untouched or be deleted.<br /> | '''Hosting Company:''' use regulation law or informal request on hosting companies who then must send a deny service signal when user want to go to that specific website. In this case, it depends on the request; the content of the website may still remain untouched or be deleted.<br /> | ||
'''Internet Service Provide:''' is often done in country-level where governments use their power and forcefully block the information. This method raises many | '''Internet Service Provide:''' is often done in country-level where governments use their power and forcefully block the information. This method raises many concerns about the freedom of speech and freedom of information, because the blocked information may not be wrong. | ||
== Conflicts == | |||
'''Internet Censorship''' is often conflicting with other exiting regulation or laws<br /> | |||
'''Online Free Speech (2006)<ref>http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/online-free-speech</ref>:''' a clear victory for free speech, the Supreme Court has announced that it will not hear the government's appeal of a ban on the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), the federal law that would criminalize constitutionally protected speech on the Internet.<s>Strike-through text</s> | |||
'''NETWORK NEUTRALITY 101: Why The Government Must Act To Preserve The Free And Open Internet (2010):'''<ref>http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-technology-and-liberty/network-neutrality-101-why-government-must-act-preserve-free-and-</ref> The Internet has become a deeply ingrained in the lives of most Americans. It looms so large, in fact, it is easy to imagine that it is immune to change — that it will always remain the free and open medium that it is now. But there are no such guarantees.<br /> | |||
'''Online Censorship in the States (2002)<ref>http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/online-censorship-states</ref>:''' In a sweeping victory for free speech rights in cyberspace, the Supreme Court struck down the Communications Decency Act in Reno v. ACLU in June 1997. The Court granted the highest level of First Amendment protection to the Internet, and cyber-activists are still dancing in the streets. Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, states are busy crafting censorship laws at home. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 13 March 2012
Overview
Internet Censorship is the action that prevents the publish of, or accessing to information on Internet. Such action is often done by governments or organizations when they believe that the information is sensitive or harmful.
The opinions about the Internet censorship are opposing in different levels (from strognly disagree to very pleased). These oppinions are dependent on the knowledge of a person as well as the censorship laws which varies on a country-to-country basics.
Method of Applying Censorship
User report and request for removal: This action can be done by anyone who thinks that the content is inappropriate, such as harassment, sexual action, foul language on a website for children. The content will be removed completely if the report is accurate.
Hosting Company: use regulation law or informal request on hosting companies who then must send a deny service signal when user want to go to that specific website. In this case, it depends on the request; the content of the website may still remain untouched or be deleted.
Internet Service Provide: is often done in country-level where governments use their power and forcefully block the information. This method raises many concerns about the freedom of speech and freedom of information, because the blocked information may not be wrong.
Conflicts
Internet Censorship is often conflicting with other exiting regulation or laws
Online Free Speech (2006)[1]: a clear victory for free speech, the Supreme Court has announced that it will not hear the government's appeal of a ban on the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), the federal law that would criminalize constitutionally protected speech on the Internet.Strike-through text
NETWORK NEUTRALITY 101: Why The Government Must Act To Preserve The Free And Open Internet (2010):[2] The Internet has become a deeply ingrained in the lives of most Americans. It looms so large, in fact, it is easy to imagine that it is immune to change — that it will always remain the free and open medium that it is now. But there are no such guarantees.
Online Censorship in the States (2002)[3]: In a sweeping victory for free speech rights in cyberspace, the Supreme Court struck down the Communications Decency Act in Reno v. ACLU in June 1997. The Court granted the highest level of First Amendment protection to the Internet, and cyber-activists are still dancing in the streets. Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, states are busy crafting censorship laws at home.