Talk:Andrew Carnegie/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jeffrey Scott Bernstein
(love it!)
 
imported>John Stephenson
m (moved Talk:Andrew Carnegie to Talk:Andrew Carnegie/Draft over redirect: Cannot get the banner info on approved-article Talk pages to show with Citable Versions subpages, so moving this whence it came for now)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
==Praise and Style question==
Professor Jensen! I love this article! So sharp and concise! I read all about Carnegie when I was in the process of envisioning Howard Hughes as a new type of 20th century tycoon. But may I ask you something? Is there any sort of consensus on Citizendium about some things? Is it 1850's or 1850s? Is it "Pa" for Pennsylvania or "PA"? In the Kennedy page, I originally had "Ma" for example, but changed it to "MA". Are to use "--" or " - "? Is there a consensus? Sorry to bother you with this.[[User:Jeffrey Scott Bernstein|Jeffrey Scott Bernstein]] 22:12, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
Professor Jensen! I love this article! So sharp and concise! I read all about Carnegie when I was in the process of envisioning Howard Hughes as a new type of 20th century tycoon. But may I ask you something? Is there any sort of consensus on Citizendium about some things? Is it 1850's or 1850s? Is it "Pa" for Pennsylvania or "PA"? In the Kennedy page, I originally had "Ma" for example, but changed it to "MA". Are to use "--" or " - "? Is there a consensus? Sorry to bother you with this.[[User:Jeffrey Scott Bernstein|Jeffrey Scott Bernstein]] 22:12, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
::Thanks for the comments! I just finished the Nasaw book and have long admired Carnegie.  It's 1850s  (no apostrophe). As for state abbreviations, I dislike the postal codes and can never get Michigan-Missouri-Mississippi-Montana, etc. straight! I always rely on Chicago Manual of Style for these points...  It's the best style manual going, but CZ has not officially adopted any. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:52, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
==Image==
A more "perfect pose" lede image is possible here, but I felt this one was filled with realism, and thus seemed to make the man more human.  Comments welcome. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 02:30, 20 December 2007 (CST)
==APPROVED Version 1.0== <div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Andrew_Carnegie&oldid=100245775 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>

Latest revision as of 14:21, 2 October 2013

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition 1835-1919, Scottish-American steel maker, philanthropist and peace activist [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Business and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Praise and Style question

Professor Jensen! I love this article! So sharp and concise! I read all about Carnegie when I was in the process of envisioning Howard Hughes as a new type of 20th century tycoon. But may I ask you something? Is there any sort of consensus on Citizendium about some things? Is it 1850's or 1850s? Is it "Pa" for Pennsylvania or "PA"? In the Kennedy page, I originally had "Ma" for example, but changed it to "MA". Are to use "--" or " - "? Is there a consensus? Sorry to bother you with this.Jeffrey Scott Bernstein 22:12, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

Thanks for the comments! I just finished the Nasaw book and have long admired Carnegie. It's 1850s (no apostrophe). As for state abbreviations, I dislike the postal codes and can never get Michigan-Missouri-Mississippi-Montana, etc. straight! I always rely on Chicago Manual of Style for these points... It's the best style manual going, but CZ has not officially adopted any. Richard Jensen 00:52, 9 October 2007 (CDT)

Image

A more "perfect pose" lede image is possible here, but I felt this one was filled with realism, and thus seemed to make the man more human. Comments welcome. Stephen Ewen 02:30, 20 December 2007 (CST)

==APPROVED Version 1.0==