Scientific method/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(annotating Achinstein's book)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(add external link to 17,400 Google Books with limited or full preview: on 'scientific method')
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
* [http://www.freeinquiry.com/intro-to-sci.html An Introduction to Science: Scientific Thinking and a scientific method] by Steven D. Schafersman.
* [http://www.freeinquiry.com/intro-to-sci.html An Introduction to Science: Scientific Thinking and a scientific method] by Steven D. Schafersman.
* [http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html Introduction to a scientific method]
* [http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html Introduction to a scientific method]
* [http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/office/ganderson/es10/lectures/lecture01/lecture01.html Scientific Method]
* [http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/anaeng-r.pdf Analysis and Synthesis: On Scientific Method based on a study by Bernhard Riemann] From the [http://www.swemorph.com  Swedish Morphological Society]
* [http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/anaeng-r.pdf Analysis and Synthesis: On Scientific Method based on a study by Bernhard Riemann] From the [http://www.swemorph.com  Swedish Morphological Society]
* [http://www.sciencemadesimple.com/scientific_method.html Using the scientific method for designing science fair projects] from [http://www.sciencemadesimple.com Science Made Simple]
* [http://www.sciencemadesimple.com/scientific_method.html Using the scientific method for designing science fair projects] from [http://www.sciencemadesimple.com Science Made Simple]
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/modsbook09.html Scientific Revolution] from the ''Internet History Sourcebooks Project''
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/modsbook09.html Scientific Revolution] from the ''Internet History Sourcebooks Project''
* Carnap R (1950) [http://www.ditext.com/carnap/carnap.html Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology] Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:20-40.
* Carnap R (1950) [http://www.ditext.com/carnap/carnap.html Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology] Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:20-40.
* Achinstein P (editor) (2004) ''Science Rules: A Historical Introduction to Scientific Methods'' The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. ISBN
* Achinstein P (editor) (2004) [http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title_pages/3303.html ''Science Rules: A Historical Introduction to Scientific Methods''] The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. ISBN
0-8018-7944-2
0-8018-7944-2
:*From the publisher's description: "Bringing together key primary sources spanning almost four centuries, Science Rules introduces readers to scientific methods that have played a prominent role in the history of scientific practice. Editor Peter Achinstein includes works by scientists and philosophers of science to offer a new perspective on the nature of scientific reasoning. For each of the methods discussed, he presents the original formulation of the method; selections written by a proponent of the method together with an application to a particular scientific example; and a critical analysis of the method that draws on historical and contemporary sources. The methods included in this volume are Cartesian rationalism with an application to Descartes' laws of motion; Newton's inductivism and the law of gravity; two versions of hypothetico-deductivism—those of William Whewell and Karl Popper—and the nineteenth-century wave theory of light; Paul Feyerabend's principle of proliferation and Thomas Kuhn's views on scientific values, both of which deny that there are universal rules of method, with an application to Galileo's tower argument. Included also is a famous nineteenth-century debate about scientific reasoning between the hypothetico-deductivist William Whewell and the inductivist John Stuart Mill; and an account of the realism-antirealism dispute about unobservables in science, with a consideration of Perrin's argument for the existence of molecules in the early twentieth century."
:*From the publisher's description: "Bringing together key primary sources spanning almost four centuries, Science Rules introduces readers to scientific methods that have played a prominent role in the history of scientific practice. Editor Peter Achinstein includes works by scientists and philosophers of science to offer a new perspective on the nature of scientific reasoning. For each of the methods discussed, he presents the original formulation of the method; selections written by a proponent of the method together with an application to a particular scientific example; and a critical analysis of the method that draws on historical and contemporary sources. The methods included in this volume are Cartesian rationalism with an application to Descartes' laws of motion; Newton's inductivism and the law of gravity; two versions of hypothetico-deductivism—those of William Whewell and Karl Popper—and the nineteenth-century wave theory of light; Paul Feyerabend's principle of proliferation and Thomas Kuhn's views on scientific values, both of which deny that there are universal rules of method, with an application to Galileo's tower argument. Included also is a famous nineteenth-century debate about scientific reasoning between the hypothetico-deductivist William Whewell and the inductivist John Stuart Mill; and an account of the realism-antirealism dispute about unobservables in science, with a consideration of Perrin's argument for the existence of molecules in the early twentieth century."
* Evolutionary psychologist Irene Pepperberg at [http://www.edge.org/ Edge.org] about [http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_2.html Hypothesis Testing]
:Argues that the appropriateness of [[hypothesis testing]] for a particular research subject depends on [[prior knowledge]] about this very subject and has to be complemented in sensible ways with what some call (derogatorily) "fishing expeditions" or, more neutrally, [[data-driven research]].
* [http://tinyurl.com/nxeptu Google Books Limited or Full Preview on: scientific method.] 17,400 books as of 22-Jul-2009.

Latest revision as of 20:56, 22 July 2009

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
A hand-picked, annotated list of Web resources about Scientific method.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.

0-8018-7944-2

  • From the publisher's description: "Bringing together key primary sources spanning almost four centuries, Science Rules introduces readers to scientific methods that have played a prominent role in the history of scientific practice. Editor Peter Achinstein includes works by scientists and philosophers of science to offer a new perspective on the nature of scientific reasoning. For each of the methods discussed, he presents the original formulation of the method; selections written by a proponent of the method together with an application to a particular scientific example; and a critical analysis of the method that draws on historical and contemporary sources. The methods included in this volume are Cartesian rationalism with an application to Descartes' laws of motion; Newton's inductivism and the law of gravity; two versions of hypothetico-deductivism—those of William Whewell and Karl Popper—and the nineteenth-century wave theory of light; Paul Feyerabend's principle of proliferation and Thomas Kuhn's views on scientific values, both of which deny that there are universal rules of method, with an application to Galileo's tower argument. Included also is a famous nineteenth-century debate about scientific reasoning between the hypothetico-deductivist William Whewell and the inductivist John Stuart Mill; and an account of the realism-antirealism dispute about unobservables in science, with a consideration of Perrin's argument for the existence of molecules in the early twentieth century."
Argues that the appropriateness of hypothesis testing for a particular research subject depends on prior knowledge about this very subject and has to be complemented in sensible ways with what some call (derogatorily) "fishing expeditions" or, more neutrally, data-driven research.