CZ Talk:Technical/Buglist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (Question) |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Question: should we use that system for ''all'' bugs? I'm thinking so; it's a lot more sophisticated, i.e., "the right tool for the job," for bug tracking and feature requesting. What do you think? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:39, 28 August 2007 (CDT) | Question: should we use that system for ''all'' bugs? I'm thinking so; it's a lot more sophisticated, i.e., "the right tool for the job," for bug tracking and feature requesting. What do you think? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:39, 28 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I never intended this to be permanent; it's just that there was no existing place for it. Go for it.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:53, 28 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:53, 28 August 2007
Logo is temporary. --Robert W King 13:53, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
- Logo is hilariously clever. :-) —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 14:55, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
All, with Eric Gearhart joining us as a sysadmin, we've got Trac up and running here: http://trac.citizendium.org/
Question: should we use that system for all bugs? I'm thinking so; it's a lot more sophisticated, i.e., "the right tool for the job," for bug tracking and feature requesting. What do you think? --Larry Sanger 08:39, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
- I never intended this to be permanent; it's just that there was no existing place for it. Go for it.--Robert W King 13:53, 28 August 2007 (CDT)