Polynomial: Difference between revisions
imported>Michael Hardy (A link to "irrational" is ... irrational. Perhaps one to "irrational expression" might make sense if that concept admits any suitable definition and is found worthy of an article.) |
imported>Michael Hardy m (→Definition: format) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Let us consider some expressions like <math>X^2-2X+1</math>, <math>\frac{1}{2}X^3+X-\sqrt{2}</math>, or <math>2X^5-3X^2+1</math>. We can write all of them as follows: | Let us consider some expressions like <math>X^2-2X+1</math>, <math>\frac{1}{2}X^3+X-\sqrt{2}</math>, or <math>2X^5-3X^2+1</math>. We can write all of them as follows: | ||
: <math>X^2-2X+1=1+(-2)X+1X^2+0X^3+0X^4+\cdots,</math> | |||
: <math>\frac{1}{2}X^3+X-\sqrt{2}=-\sqrt{2}+1X+0X^2+\frac{1}{2}X^3+0X^4+\cdots,</math> | |||
: <math>2X^5-3X^2+1=1+0X+(-3)X^2+0X^3+0X^4+2X^5+0X^6+\cdots.</math> | |||
This suggests that a polynomial can be entirely defined by giving a sequence of numbers, which are called its ''coefficients'', all of them being zero from some rank. For instance the three polynomials above can be written respectively <math>(1,-2,1,0,0,\cdots)</math>, <math>\left(-\sqrt{2},1,0,\frac{1}{2},0,\cdots\right)</math>, and <math>(1,0,-3,0,0,2,0,\cdots)</math>, the dots meaning the sequence continues with an infinity of zeros. This leads to the definition below. | This suggests that a polynomial can be entirely defined by giving a sequence of numbers, which are called its ''coefficients'', all of them being zero from some rank. For instance the three polynomials above can be written respectively <math>(1,-2,1,0,0,\cdots)</math>, <math>\left(-\sqrt{2},1,0,\frac{1}{2},0,\cdots\right)</math>, and <math>(1,0,-3,0,0,2,0,\cdots)</math>, the dots meaning the sequence continues with an infinity of zeros. This leads to the definition below. | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 27 April 2007
In algebra, a polynomial is, roughly speaking, a formal expression obtained from constant numbers and one or several unspecified numbers called "variables", denoted by letters like Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x} , Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle y} , etc., by making a finite number of additions, subtractions and multiplications. For instance, Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x^2-2x+1} is a polynomial of one variable, , whereas is a polynomial of two variables, and . Expressions like or are not polynomials ; the first one is a rational function, and the second one is an irrational expression, due to the square root symbol. Let us remark however that any operation may be allowed between constant numbers (including fractions or taking square root), as in the example .
It may be convenient to think of a polynomial as a function of its variables, that is, or . Such a function is called a polynomial function. But in reality, both concepts are different, the unspecified variables being purely formal entities when one thinks of an abstract polynomial, whereas they are meant to be replaced by any number when one thinks of a function. The distinction is important in abstract algebra, because what we have called "constant numbers" is more generally replaced by any ring, and for some rings the two concepts cannot be identified. There is not such a problem with polynomials over rings of usual numbers like integers, rational, real or complex numbers. Still it is important to understand that calculations with polynomials can be conceived in an only formal way, without giving any special ontological status to the variables. To make the distinction clear, it is common in algebra to denote the abstract variables with capital letters (, , etc.), while variables of functions are still denoted with lowercase letters. We will use this convention in what follows.
Polynomials of one variable
In this section we deal with the simplest case, that is, polynomials of only one variable, denoted . The "constant numbers" are the element of any commutative ring . The reader who is not accustomed to abstract algebra may replace by a familiar set of numbers, like the set of the real numbers, as it is the case in the example above, and still can grasp most of what follows.
Definition
Let us consider some expressions like , , or . We can write all of them as follows:
This suggests that a polynomial can be entirely defined by giving a sequence of numbers, which are called its coefficients, all of them being zero from some rank. For instance the three polynomials above can be written respectively , , and , the dots meaning the sequence continues with an infinity of zeros. This leads to the definition below.
Definition. A polynomial , over the ring is a sequence of elements of , called the coefficients of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle P} , this sequence containing only a finite number of nonzero terms. The rank of the last nonzero term is called the degree of the polynomial.
Hence, the degrees of the three polynomials given above are respectively 2, 3 and 5. By convention, the degree of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (0,0,\cdots)} is set to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -\infty} .
This definition may surprise the reader, because in reality, one thinks of a polynomial as an expression of the form Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a_0+a_1X+a_2X^2+\cdots+a_nX^n} rather than Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left(a_0,a_1,a_2,\cdots ,a_n,\cdots\right)} . We will progressively show how to return to this usual way of writing a polynomial. First, we identify any element Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a_0} of the ring to the polynomial Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left(a_0,0,0,\cdots\right)} . For instance, we write only Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 7} instead of the cumbersome Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left(7,0,0,\cdots\right)} , (or in the familiar fashion Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 7+0X+0X^2+\cdots} ).
Secondly, we merely denote by Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X} the polynomial
This is natural, as in the familiar fashion this sequence corresponds to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 0+1X+0X^2+0X^3+\cdots} It remains to give a sense to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X^2} , Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X^3} , etc. This will be made in the next two subsections.
Calculation rules
We now define addition and multiplication of polynomials, beginning with addition, which is easy.
Addition
With the traditional notation, if we have Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle P=2X^5-3X^2+1} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle Q=-X^5+4X^4+2X^2-1} , we want to have Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle P+Q=(2-1)X^5+4X^4+(-3+2)X^2+1-1=X^5+4X^4-X^2} , that is, one wants to add coefficients separately for each degree. This leads to the formal definition below.
Definition. Given two polynomials and , the sum is defined by .
Multiplication
Multiplication is harder to define. Let us begin with an example using traditional notation. For and , we want to have
One can observe that the coefficient of say, , is obtained by adding , and , that is, by adding all the so that , where the denote the coefficients of and the those of . Those mechanics lead to give the definition below.
Definition. Given two polynomials and , the product is defined by , where for every index , the coefficient is given by .
The reader which is upset by those cumbersome notations should just retain that this definition allows to multiply polynomials (considered as mere sequences of coefficients) as one is used to do in elementary algebra (using the traditional notation, as in the example). The only striking fact is that in our construction, does not represent a number, but a pure abstract entity for which we have defined some rules of calculation.
The algebra
With the definition above, one can verify that the product of the polynomial by itself, that is , is the sequence . More generally, for each natural number , one can verify that the -th power of is given by , where the is the coefficient of index and all other coefficients are zeros. In particular, we have the usual convention , which we identified to the constant .
Now, any polynomial is exactly equal to , where the addition and the powers (which are mere repetitions of multiplications) are defined as in the preceding subsections. Our whole construction legitimates the traditional notation, and from now on, we will only use the later, with which calculations use natural rules of elementary algebra. It is however important to remember that the "variable" did not denote some number in our construction, but a particular sequence of coefficients. We have succeeded in defining polynomials in a purely formal manner.